Thursday, 17 July 2014

THE RACIAL DIVIDE IN ALAN PATON’S ‘CRY, THE BELOVED COUNTRY’


Arguably, the most dominant thematic current in Alan Paton’s ‘Cry, the Beloved Country’ is the issue of racial divide between the South African Whites and Blacks. Paton explores the division in minute detail, both at the microcosmic and the macroscopic level to give a rounded dimension to the South African experience during those times.

In this novel, personal collides with the political in a jarring way. The Blacks, who form a chunk of South Africa’s population, are oppressed due to the denial of human rights and the decimation of their tribal system while the minority of the population, that is the Whites, live in fear of the majority due to the rising crime rates against them. The rising crime rates lead to the Whites hating the natives all the more, leading to a vicious cycle, where the lacuna between them only keeps getting wider. This is the social landscape of South Africa at that time. Paton, to deepen his theme, also uses the physical landscape of South Africa to hold symbolic meaning. 

The novel opens with a description of Natal’s natural beauty – the hills are verdant and rolling, the grass is “rich and matted”. The soil holds moisture and is not overused. However, as one goes down the valley, the earth is red, bare and infertile. The maize has stunted growth whereas the streams run dry and the ground is overused by the people and the cattle. The native bird, the titihoya, which sings in the hills, is virtually missing here. These contrasts which are subtle at the opening of the novel gains a garb of racial segregation later in Book 2, as Paton refrains the same passage of Natal’s landscape. The lush hilly regions are occupied by the White South Africans whereas the black South Africans are forced to settle down the valleys. This leads to overcrowding and hence the ground is overused, rendering it difficult to yield. Through this symbolism, Paton probably hints at the natural, untainted and free landscape before the colonization of South Africa or more precisely, before the implementation of racial segregation. If these divisions had been absent, the land of South Africa wouldn’t have been cruel and barren, not only physically but also socially and politically. This shows that life down the valley has been sapped away in every way. 
The very fiber of a moral system that is the family system is described by Paton as thus:
“They are valleys of old men and old women, of mothers and children. The men are away, the young men and the girls are away. The soil cannot keep them anymore.” (p.8, ‘Cry, The Beloved Country’)
Sons and daughters have left the family in order to search for a better living in the city of Johannesburg. When the narrative shifts to this city, the division which was subtle in Natal becomes more palpable, thriving and ugly.

Paton employs the narrative technique of a collage of anonymous voices speaking to describe the general frustration and desperation among the Blacks, who have to fend for a living space. Shanty Town is one representation of this. People from all over pour in this slum-like town, made of poles, sacks and the long grasses of the South African plains due to the lack of sufficient housing facilities. The waiting lists to even get a boarding space are never-ending and securing it through a bribe is no guarantee for ultimately getting a space. The accommodations go overboard with a dozen people stuffed into two rooms and due to the intrusion of privacies. When a fresh tide of boarders arrives, they are driven away by the police. The description of Shanty Town rounds up with the anecdote of a woman losing her sick daughter to death. These strands of frustration, lack of basic rights and the destruction of the family system is reflective of the destruction of African life as a whole.

Nevertheless, even though the city of Johannesburg has inherently lost its moral and social moorings, it is not entirely devoid of any good. There does exist a number of White South Africans who want to bridge the gap between them and the Blacks and hence, they do their best to foster friendship. One striking instance would be during the boycott of buses where the Blacks have boycotted the buses and hence, people have to walk eleven miles to Alexandra. Here, the rays of racial harmony glimmers as white drivers risk the police in order to help the native pedestrians by offering them rides in their car. The problem of racial segregation would definitely have been solved if this solidarity was shared by all White South Africans towards the Blacks. However, the technique of anonymous voices is again brought in by Paton to express the differing views among the liberal Whites against the prejudiced ones. Whereas one voice suggests that education for the Blacks is a solution to mitigate the crime rates against the Whites, another voice argues that schooling Blacks would in turn produce cleverer criminals. Hence, there is greater segregation and misunderstanding and is the dominant hard reality as Blacks turn violent while the Whites live barricaded in their prison of fear.
The racial tension in South Africa’s gains a new tinge of irony as Arthur Jarvis, a pro Black rights crusader, is murdered at the hands of a Black parson’s son. Arthur Jarvis stands for the paragon that espouses racial harmony as it is made evident through the snippets in his writings. His tract on native crime has a plausible solution and that is greater freedom and opportunity for the Blacks and not suppression and “exploitation.” Just like the Europeans termed the colonization of Africa as a divine mission, similarly, Arthur contends the base of the prejudice of White South Africans that stands on the notion that it is God’s will for South Africans to remain unskilled workers and trying to educate them would be “not Christian”. Arthur rebuts this and is of the view that the Blacks should be allowed to develop their God-given abilities and should enjoy full rights of freedom in their own land.

Arthur’s writings not only suggests a solution to the racial dilemma between the general Whites and Blacks but also in the personal world of Stephen Kumalo‘s and James Jarvis’. Arthur’s comments on his parents: But of South Africa I learned nothing at all.” (p.150, ‘Cry, The Beloved Country’). This comment is significant as it underscores the alienation between the hills and the valleys, the White and the natives in the landscape of Natal. When Kumalo tells James Jarvis: “the heaviest thing of all my years, is the heaviest thing of all your years also”, there is finally a common ground of sorrow and grief that can be shared by the two men, and hence bring them together. Jarvis, who did not socialize with the natives earlier nor met eye-to-eye with his own son’s social and political cause, now empathizes with Kumalo and even plans for the betterment of Ndotsheni by proposing to build a dam. However, Paton makes Arthur’s son to be symbolic of the possibility of unity between the Whites and the Blacks. Unlike his grandfather’s reservations, Arthur’s son enters Kumalo’s house without hesitation in his eagerness to learn Zulu. This shows a hope in the country’s children living without racial prejudice. Paton suggests that the bridge between this divide much lies in the seed of understanding and love. Msimangu says:     
“I see only one hope for our country, and that is when white men and black men . . . desiring only the good of their country, come together to work for it. (p.37, ‘Cry, The Beloved Country’)


In order to have this solidarity, the Whites must understand that the blacks want to “walk upright in the land where they were born, and be free to use the fruits of the earth,” and the Blacks must understand that the Whites hid their fear with “fierceness and anger” and “They were afraid because they were so few.” (p.235). This fear can only be mitigated through “love.” Paton suggests the bridging of this racial gap before it is too late that “one day when they (the Whites) turn to loving they will find we (the Blacks) are turned to hating.” (p.235, ‘Cry, The Beloved Country’)

EXPLORING WOMEN’S IDENTITY IN KAMALA DAS’ POEM – ‘THE OLD PLAYHOUSE’


We live in a land of irony. We worship goddesses and female deities and shout slogans to our ‘Bharat Mata’, yet it is no myth that Indian women today are raped, brutalized, subjugated, silenced and killed in the name of honor. This is the type of society that is our India. Patriarchal. Men superior over women. The same social construct, which Kamala Das, a Malabar-born poet endeavored to oppose with vehemence and venom. Her poetry was a bold and feisty depiction of feminine identity and sexuality at a time when women poets were stereotyped to write about girlie fantasies of eternal, bloodless and unrequited love.

‘The Old Playhouse’ is one such poem of Kamala Das that attempts to put the relationship between the masculine and feminine world under a lens. It charts the contemplations of a woman trapped in a loveless marriage to an overbearing man.
The title of the poem is significant. A playhouse is a miniature rendition of a house for children to play in. The girl-child uses dolls as their own children, tenderly nurturing and cooking while their ‘husbands’ are at work, for boys would much prefer to play with toy cars or guns. Thus, the playhouse reinforces traditional gender roles and maintains hegemony of a man over woman. Hence, it becomes a microcosm for a much larger concept, symbolizing the traditional patriarchal society, as a whole. It is these dichotomous conventions of the qualities ascribed for men and women, that Das meddles with.

Das’ poem is laden with rich, heavy and no-holds-barred metaphors and imagery, as she opens with these lines:

“You planned to tame a swallow, to hold her
In the long summer of your love so that she would forget
Not the raw seasons alone, and the homes left behind, but
Also her nature, the urge to fly, and the endless
Pathways of the sky.” (1-5)
The bird’s flight is paralleled to the wife’s urgency for freedom, however she is unable to break away as her husband tries to cage her and domesticate her, so that she would forget her instinctual wish for flight. He expects her to serve him routinely and eternally, of pouring saccharine tablets into his tea and giving him his vitamins. Rebelling against the etiquette of ‘never kiss and tell’, Das explicitly describes sexuality between the two partners:
You dribbled spittle into my mouth, you poured

Yourself into every nook and cranny, you embalmed

My poor lust with your bitter-sweet juices" (10-12).

It is crystal clear that the love-making is devoid of any spiritual connection and passion and the man simply wallows in lust for her. His horrific form dwarfs her in comparison, as she writes:

Cowering

Beneath your monstrous ego I ate the magic loaf and

Became a dwarf” (14-16)

The tedium of his omnipresence is also brought out in the following lines:

All pervasive is the male scent of your breath. The cut flowers

In the vases have begun to smell of human sweat
…” (22-23)

It is also evident that the playhouse has lost all its inherent meanings and innocence as she laments:

“…….There is

No more singing, no more dance, my mind is an old

Playhouse with all its lights put out.” (23-26)

Das alludes to Greek mythology towards the end of the poem, referring her husband to Narcissus and the wife to the nymph Echo. Narcissus is well known to have rejected Echo’s true love and therefore was doomed to fall in love with his own reflection in the water, at which he stared to death. Das uses this comparison to describe her husband’s love for his own self and she even sardonically spits this in the following lines:

I came to you but to learn

What I was, and by learning, to learn to grow, but every

Lesson you gave was about yourself" (6-8).


Das writes her poem in free verse using just one stanza and a confessional tone. This form and her frequent repetition of ideas express her urgency to fly with her thoughts feverishly alive to instill in us the intensity of her feelings. The autobiographical style conveys universality to her poem as well as it reveals it to be her own experience also, as she was subject to patriarchal domination in her household, being married off early and only fit to be a mother only when she had her third child born. Therefore, literature became a vent for her contained emotions, becoming a choral voice for the Indian womanhood, fervidly calling for equality and harmony between the two sexes - an issue which was rife during her times and sadly enough, despite all the technological and ideological advancements, still continues to be alive, even to this day.

THE CONCEPT OF HELL IN "DOCTOR FAUSTUS"

THE CONCEPT OF HELL IN 
"DOCTOR FAUSTUS"

The play Doctor Faustus, by Christopher Marlowe is a perfect example that mirrored the context of Christianity during those days and delves into a topic that is at its heart: redemption from sin. Infused with an authentic and literal Christian core, Doctor Faustus can be read as a cautionary tale, as is evident in the closing chorus, to obey the commands of heaven. Scholar R.M. Dawkins famously remarked that Doctor Faustus tells “the story of a Renaissance man who had to pay the medieval price for being one.” This quotation refers to the clash between medieval world and the world of the emerging Renaissance. The medieval world placed God at the center of existence while the Renaissance changed the focus to individualism and on the scientific inquiry into the natural world.

In the opening soliloquy, Doctor Faustus considers and rejects the medieval traditional way of thinking. He resolves, in full Renaissance spirit, to accept no limits, traditions, or authorities in his quest for knowledge, wealth, and power. Since he crosses these boundaries forbidden by Christianity, and the act of doing so was categorized as sin, the unrepentant Faustus is ultimately doomed to experience Hell.

Various myths and mythologies have propounded different concepts of Hell. According to the Roman Catholic view, Jesus speaks of “Gehenna” that is the “unquenchable fire”, into which the sinners are thrown after their deeds are accounted for. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, published in 1992 and promulgated by Pope John Paul II further appends the concept of hell in the following words:
“To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God's merciful love means remaining separated from him forever by our own free choice. This state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed is called "hell.””

Therefore, there is a clear corollary that Hell can be further subdivided into a physical conventional hell and a spiritual hell, which parallels the concept in Doctor Faustus. It is befitting to say that in Doctor Faustus, spiritual hell takes precedence, by and large. This is evident in Mephistopheles’ own example. Mephistopheles states that hell is primarily a state of the spirit and he is always in hell, even when he appears on earth, because true hell is separation from God.

According to the Christian theology, the greatest sin of a man lies in his pursuit to become a God himself by rejecting God and renouncing Christianity. And for this “aspiring pride and insolence” even Lucifer, “an angel once and most dearly loved by God”, was turned out of heaven to be damned forever. Mephistopheles is one of those “unhappy spirits that fell with Lucifer” and is condemned to ever-lasting hell. When Faustus asks him how he is out of hell at that time, the reply from Mephistopheles is deep and melancholic:
Why this is hell, nor am I out of it:
Think’st thou that I, who saw the face of God,
And tasted the eternal joys of heaven,
Am not tormented with ten thousand hells,
In being depriv’d of everlasting bliss?”
Thus Mephistopheles reveals with impact that by losing the presence of God and Heaven, he experiences a constant gnawing at his heart. Hence hell is within one’s own self. Milton’s Paradise Lost echoes these similar views in the following lines:
“The mind is its own place, and in itself,
can make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven.”

Faustus, in his hunger for knowledge, fails to grasp the spiritual aspect of hell and questions Mephistopheles now and then regarding the location and nature of hell, which he must have construed to be a geographical place according to the Theology he studied. Faustus’ tragic folly in prizing over knowledge rather than wisdom makes him see this in a poor light of understanding. He even goes to the extent of labeling hell as a “fable” when Mephistopheles tells him that “All places shall be hell that is not heaven.” Therefore, Faustus eventually follows in Lucifer’s own footsteps by renouncing God in order to “gain a deity”, turning a deaf ear to every warning signal of prayer, penitence and repentance available to him and rolling deep into the quagmire of sin. After the commission of his act of surrendering his soul to the Devil, Faustus becomes a prey to his own doubts and diffidence and an acute conflict between heaven and hell starts raging in his soul and lasts till his tragic end.

In the closing scene, when the path of repentance is long left behind and doom is inevitable, do Faustus comes to grasp the real essence of Hell. However, in the final scene, both the physical and the spiritual hell come into the picture. Nevertheless, the latter takes the primacy. And the most poignant soliloquy of Doctor Faustus, starting just before an hour of his final fall, reveals in a very compelling manner the deep agony of a horror-struck soul. The dim and awful prospect of a gaping hell strikes terror in his heart and just like Mephistopheles, Faustus is also tormented with thousand hells, in being deprived of everlasting bliss. The excruciating pangs and tortures of “thousand hells” find the most poignant expression in such forceful lines as:
O God,
If thou will not have mercy on my soul,
Yet for Christ’s sake, whose blood hath ransom’d me,
Impose some end to my incessant pain.
Let Faustus live in hell a thousand years,
A hundred thousand, and at last be saved!”

To conclude, even though Heaven or Paradise or Life after Death was indoctrinated by the Christian theology to be a human’s ultimate motive and desire, Hell by itself was a powerful motivator in order to attain Heaven. This deterred people from committing acts of sins and disobeying God’s commands. Doctor Faustus as a morality cum tragedy play can be viewed as a cautionary tale to warn the people of those times from insolent acts of aspiring pride and crossing boundaries to seek knowledge and hence save themselves from sin and ultimately Hell.